Live Demonstration

Watch Ithildin work

It isn’t a better lawyer across the table. It’s a better record.

Live transcription, contradiction detection, and follow-up suggestions as testimony unfolds.

Harmon v. Calloway · Deposition of Robert Harmon
REC02:14:07
Signals
Contradictions0
Exhibits used0 / 7
Answers scored0

Listening. Nothing conflicts with the record yet.

p.14 : l.470 flagged

Deposition Heat Map

Every line.
Color-coded.

Nothing you caught walks out of the room.

A visual transcript where clean testimony is green, inconsistencies are orange, and contradictions glow red. At a glance, see exactly where the deposition got dangerous.

app.ithildin.io/depose/harmon-v-calloway/heatmap
Deposition Heat Map · Robert Harmon
Clean (12)
Watch (1)
Inconsistent (2)
Contradiction (3)
1QWere you at the facility on March 14th?
2AYes. I was there from six until approximately nine.
3QDid you interact with Mr. Calloway that evening?
4ANo. I never saw Calloway there.
5QWhat was your purpose at the facility?
6ARoutine server maintenance. Standard check.
7QWere you accompanied by anyone that evening?
8ANo, I was alone the entire time.
WATCHWatch: inconsistent with badge log
9QExhibit 3. Your badge log shows entry at 7:43 PM.
10AThat log... may have errors in it.
INCONSISTENTEvasion: challenging document integrity
11QYou're saying the facility's badge log is inaccurate?
12AI... yes. It sometimes misrecords entries.
INCONSISTENTHedging: qualified denial, evasion pattern
13QExhibit 7. Calloway's badge, same exact timestamp as yours.
14AI may have seen him briefly. I didn't think it was relevant.
CONTRADICTIONCONTRADICTION: "I never saw Calloway" (4:12)
15QYou testified moments ago you never saw him. Which is accurate?
16AIt was brief. I forgot.
CONTRADICTIONMemory lapse: consider immediate impeachment
17QHow many times have you revised this account today?
18AThis is the first time.
CONTRADICTIONDEMONSTRABLY FALSE: see declaration 4/18
3 contradictions · 2 inconsistencies · 1 watch flagEvery line color-coded in real time

Before You Walk In

The entire case story.
One screen.

You did the prep. This makes sure none of it is wasted.

Upload your documents and Ithildin builds the case timeline and evidence map automatically. Gaps, conflicts, and all.

Master Chronology

Master Chronology

Matter: Harmon v. Calloway·Jan 2024 – Jul 2024·3 phases·8 entries·Attorney Work Product
Collapse all
1
Access and CredentialsJan 2024 – Mar 2024

Badge provisioning, server room policy, and the run-up to March 14.

01/15/2024Master services agreement executed between the parties.CounselCONTRACT
02/03/2024Email chain establishes the shared server room access protocol.FacilitiesKNOWLEDGE
03/07/2024Badge credentials issued to Harmon and Calloway on a single request.FacilitiesCONTROLS GAP
2
The Evening of March 14Mar 2024

Conflicting accounts of who was present, and when.

03/14/2024Badge log records Harmon entry at 6:02 PM and Calloway at 7:41 PM.Badge SystemKNOWLEDGE
03/14/2024Both badges register server room access inside the same two minutes.Badge SystemCONFLICT
03/14/2024Harmon accounts for the evening as six until nine, alone.HarmonCONTRADICTION
3
Written StatementsApr 2024 – Jul 2024

Declarations that lock the witness in well before the deposition.

04/02/2024Incident report filed with no mention of a second person present.HarmonOMISSION
04/18/2024Sworn declaration states he never saw Calloway at the facility.HarmonSCIENTER
0 / 8 entries built from your documents2 CONFLICTS

Witness Chronology

Witness Chronology

Harmon, R.Facilities Lead / Central Access Witness·4 anchor exhibits·Attorney Work Product
DateEx.Actor(s)Event / FactIssueDeposition Use
03/07/2024Ex. 3Facilities; HarmonBadge credentials issued to Harmon and Calloway on a single request.CONTROLS GAPEstablishes both men held access well before the evening in question.
03/14/2024Ex. 7Badge SystemBoth badges register server room access at 7:43 PM.CONFLICTAnchor exhibit. Confront with the timestamp before allowing any qualification.
04/18/2024Ex. 11HarmonSworn declaration states he never saw Calloway at the facility.SCIENTERLock in the declaration first, then hand him Exhibit 7.
07/31/2024Ex. 14Harmon; CounselInterrogatory response omits the shared access entirely.OMISSIONUse to show the omission repeated, rather than a single lapse.
Ordered by date · grouped by witnessEXPORT OUTLINE

Post-Deposition Intelligence

Every deposition.
Scored. Analyzed. Mapped.

The gap isn’t talent. It’s what happens between the transcript and the brief.

The moment testimony ends, Ithildin builds a complete intelligence report. Witness credibility scored, your strategy graded, and cross-witness conflicts surfaced automatically.

app.ithildin.io/reports/harmon-v-calloway
Harmon v. Calloway · 3 depositions

Credibility Score

4.2/10

Robert Harmon

HIGH RISK

Credibility Breakdown

Consistency Index34%

12 deviations flagged · page:line cited

Evasion Rate67%

Deflection cluster: Qs 4, 7, 11, 14

Contradiction Density8.3/hr

2.1× above firm historical average

Exhibit Response Accuracy41%

Recall failure on Ex. 3, 7, 12

Correction Frequency6×

4 self-amendments on material facts

4.2 · Harmon · HIGH RISK
7.8 · Depo · ABOVE AVG
3 conflicts · 13 vuln. pts
Generated · 01:14:32 post-deposition

How It Works

Four steps.
Complete intelligence.

Your instincts, with citations.

01

Upload Documents

Case files, prior testimony, contracts, exhibits. Ithildin ingests and indexes everything automatically.

02

Receive Your Outline

Structured outline with AI-suggested questions and exhibit references, ready to refine.

03

Depose with Intelligence

Live transcription and contradiction detection. Flags appear the moment testimony conflicts.

04

Review & Impeach

AI summaries, citations, a draft impeachment brief, and audio/video sync within minutes.

Built for firms that can’t
afford to miss anything.

Assume the other side is already running it.

Book a Demo